Lucid dreaming
Common myths about lucid dreaming
The claims that circulate hardest are mostly the ones with least behind them.
6 min readbeginner
"Anyone can learn it in a week"
No technique has strong evidence of reliable effectiveness. Some people become lucid easily and spontaneously; many practise for months for occasional results. A promised timeline is a marketing device.
"It is dangerous / you can get trapped"
You cannot get stuck in a dream. Sleep ends. The genuine downsides are more ordinary: fragmented sleep from techniques that require waking during the night, and occasional distressing overlap with sleep paralysis: which is unpleasant and harmless. See the safety page.
"Lucid dreams are the same as vivid dreams"
They are not, and the confusion comes from the word. Lucid means you know it is a dream. A dream can be overwhelmingly vivid and not lucid at all, which is the usual case.
"You have total control"
Control is partial, variable and often the first thing to go. Many lucid dreams involve knowing you are dreaming and being able to do very little about it. Treating control as the measure of success mostly produces frustration.
"Time runs differently in dreams"
Estimates of dreamed duration have been tested using the eye-signal method, counting out intervals from within a lucid dream, and dreamed time comes out roughly comparable to real time. The idea that a dream lasts seconds, or that hours pass in a moment, is not supported.
"It improves your waking abilities"
Rehearsal of motor skills in lucid dreams is an active research area with some interesting early results and no established effect size. Claims about creativity and problem-solving are further ahead of the evidence still.
Sources and reviewed references
3 references. What these labels mean
- 1.The Cognitive Neuroscience of Lucid DreamingPeer-reviewed research
Benjamin Baird, Sergio A. Mota-Rolim and Martin Dresler (2019) · Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
Cited for: A review of what is and is not established about lucid dreaming: its neural correlates, prevalence, induction evidence and open questions.
- 2.Induction of Lucid Dreams: A Systematic Review of EvidencePeer-reviewed research
Tadas Stumbrys, Daniel Erlacher, Melanie Schädlich and Michael Schredl (2012) · Consciousness and Cognition
Cited for: That no induction technique has strong evidence of reliable effectiveness, and that the better-supported ones are cognitive rather than external.
- 3.Lucid Dreaming Verified by Volitional Communication During REM SleepPeer-reviewed research
Stephen LaBerge, Lynne Nagel, William Dement and Vincent Zarcone (1980) · Perceptual and Motor Skills
Cited for: The eye-signalling experiments that established lucid dreaming as a verifiable state rather than a self-report.